Nuclear energy, risk, and emotions

Sabine Roeser

pp. 197-201

The pictures of the nuclear disaster in Fukushima are in our minds and are updated daily. People from around the world feel compassion for the Japanese, who have had to cope with a triple disaster: earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear accident. At the moment of writing this piece, it is far from clear how the latter of this apocalyptic triad will end. In the meantime, the debate about nuclear energy has taken an unexpected turn. In the last few years, there was a growing consensus that nuclear energy would be the solution to generate energy without CO2 emissions. The probability of an accident was said to be negligible. However, now that an accident has occurred, many people wonder whether nuclear energy is a really wise option (cf., e.g., Macilwain 2011). Germany immediately shut down several nuclear reactors, and the German Green Party achieved unprecedented results in the local elections due to its anti-nuclear position.

Publication details

DOI: 10.1007/s13347-011-0027-6

Full citation:

Roeser, S. (2011). Nuclear energy, risk, and emotions. Philosophy & Technology 24 (2), pp. 197-201.

This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.